Open Secret

Service

AI Visibility

When a buyer asks an AI engine which one to use, a handful of names come back. We measure whether yours is among them, then build the third-party presence that puts it there.

The engines will not describe your product, but they will recommend it

Every major assistant declines explicit content. None of them decline the commercial question underneath it — which processor handles high-risk billing, which age-verification vendor to shortlist, which brand makes the better product. Those answers are being generated today, for your category, with someone named in them. The refusal everyone notices has distracted the whole industry from the recommendation nobody is measuring.

The work is almost entirely off your own domain

Brands are around six times more likely to be cited through third-party sources than through their own site. In restricted categories the gap is wider still, because the engines lean harder on sources they consider independent when the subject is sensitive. Roundups, comparison pages, community discussion, review platforms and directory profiles decide this. A site redesign moves none of it.

Four engines, four different source mixes

ChatGPT resolves heavily through Bing and licensed publisher content. Gemini and AI Overviews weight what Google has indexed and what it trusts. Perplexity leans unusually hard on community discussion, which is why Reddit threads decide more of this category than anyone expects. Copilot draws on Bing plus editorial. A programme optimising one surface will report healthy numbers while three others quietly fail.

Entity resolution comes before anything else

Engines have to be able to tell that your company is one company — the legal name, the trading name, the product name and the domain all resolving to a single node rather than four unrelated stubs. In this industry that is routinely broken, because operators use different names across directories, media and their own footer for perfectly sensible commercial reasons. It is unglamorous, and it is frequently the single change that moves a score.

A score that compounds

Each month we re-run your prompt set across all four engines and report the score, the per-engine breakdown, your share of voice against named competitors, and the citation source behind every mention. The number moves and you can see what moved it. Where an engine declines a prompt entirely we report that separately, because a refused prompt is a different problem from one a competitor won.

Scope

What is in, and what is not.

Includes

  • Baseline across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Copilot — 50 prompts, three runs each
  • Prompt set built from how your buyers actually phrase the decision
  • Citation source map — which sources each engine drew on, per answer
  • Entity audit: legal name, trading name, product and domain resolving to one node
  • Organisation, Product and Review schema across the site
  • Roundup and comparison-page placement programme
  • Review-platform presence and velocity where one exists for your category
  • Community and forum presence in the places the engines actually read
  • robots.txt and AI-crawler access audit on the live domain
  • Monthly scorecard with per-engine breakdown and refused-prompt reporting

Excludes

  • Guaranteed placement in any AI answer — no platform publishes source selection, and anyone promising it is overselling
  • Buying or incentivising reviews in any form
  • Astroturfed community posts or sockpuppet accounts
  • Producing, editing, generating or distributing explicit content of any kind
  • Any work that would have us publish or transmit the material itself

Shape of the work

What happens, and when.

  1. Week 1Baseline measured, refused prompts separated from lost ones
  2. Weeks 1–3Entity and schema work shipped, crawler access confirmed
  3. Weeks 3–12Roundup, comparison and community presence built
  4. Month 2+Monthly re-measurement — the score starts moving

The demand

Nobody searches for this yet.

We measured it rather than assuming. In these categories the adult-qualified terms for this service — adult ai seo, adult aeo, ai seo for adult websites — return no search volume at all.

That is worth stating plainly on a page selling the service. It does not mean the work has no value; it means nobody is shopping for it by name, so this page exists to explain and convert rather than to rank. The demand is in front of your buyers, and the industry pages set out exactly what that looks like.

By industry

The same work, tuned per category.

Also

The other two.

6 questions

Questions we get asked

Do AI engines even answer questions about this industry?

They decline explicit content and they answer the commercial questions around it. Which payment processor, which age-verification vendor, which brand, which app — all of those return named recommendations today. The baseline measures which of your prompts return a list at all before it measures whether you are on it, and we report both numbers separately.

How long before the score moves?

Entity and schema corrections can register within two to four weeks. Roundup placement and community presence compound over three to six months. We report monthly either way, so progress is visible before it is complete.

Can you guarantee we get recommended?

No, and treat anyone who does with suspicion. No platform publishes how it selects sources. We work from measured output and correlations documented across the field, we report honestly, and we re-baseline the source map quarterly because these systems change without notice.

How is this different from SEO?

Traditional SEO gets a page ranked. This gets a company named. The inputs barely overlap — most of the work sits in third-party sources, community and editorial rather than on your site.

What happens if the number goes down?

We report it and explain what changed. These systems shift underneath everyone, and community content in particular gets weighted differently quarter to quarter. A report that only ever contains good news is not a report.

Will you handle our content?

No. We do not produce, edit, generate, upload or distribute explicit material, and that exclusion is written into every contract. We work on positioning, acquisition, measurement and the third-party presence that drives it. This is a firm line, not a negotiating position.

Taking 2 new clients this quarter

Be the name AI gets named

Fifty prompts, four engines, your categories. You will see your score and exactly who is being named instead — before you commit to anything.

Chat on WhatsApp