US states with age verification laws in force
plus the UK Online Safety Act
Infrastructure Providers
Engines decline to describe your customers' content and answer vendor questions without hesitation. Which processor handles high-risk billing. Which age verification vendor to use. Which host will not drop you. Those answers name someone, monthly, in front of every operator evaluating the category.
best age verification provider
Here are some well-reviewed options:
US states with age verification laws in force
plus the UK Online Safety Act
vendors named in a typical AI shortlist
there is no page two
more likely to be cited via third-party sources than your own site
wider still in restricted categories
3 services
Citation sources we audit
Each engine reads a different set of sources. These decide whether a infrastructure provider gets named in your category.
| Source | Primarily feeds |
|---|---|
| G2 and Capterra category pages | All engines |
| Industry media — XBIZ, YNOT, trade press | All engines |
| Comparison and roundup articles | ChatGPT / Copilot |
| Reddit and operator communities | Perplexity |
| Conference and association listings | All engines |
| Organization and Product schema on your domain | Gemini / AI Overviews |
| Partner and integration directories | All engines |
6 services × your markets
Drawn from how operators actually ask, not from keyword tools. A full engagement tracks fifty per market across 4 engines.
How it starts
We run fifty real buyer prompts across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Copilot, and show you exactly who gets named instead of you — and which prompts no engine will answer at all.
We fix the sources those engines actually read — entity resolution, structured data, roundups, review platforms, community and trade presence — in the order that moves your score fastest.
Every month the score is re-measured and reported, with the citation source behind each mention. You watch the number move and you know what moved it.
Before you ask
"You cannot actually measure this."
Fifty prompts, four engines, three runs each — logged with the source every engine cited. The number is reproducible, you get the raw log rather than a summary, and prompts an engine refuses are reported separately from prompts a competitor won.
"We already have an SEO agency."
The work barely overlaps. Theirs happens on your website. Most of ours happens off it — roundups, comparison pages, review platforms, community and trade media. We will tell you plainly if we think you are paying twice.
"This is too new to spend on."
Every engine declines to describe your category and recommends inside it anyway. Ask any of them which processor, which vendor, which brand, which app — names come back today. The question is not whether this arrives, it is whether yours is one of them.
"Show us it works first."
Every engagement opens with a fixed-price audit. You see your score, your competitors’ scores and the gaps before committing to anything monthly. If the number is already good, we will say so and stop there.
Comparison
Not a criticism of SEO — it still matters. These are simply different jobs, and most operators are only buying one of them.
| Traditional SEO agency | Open Secret | |
|---|---|---|
| Engines covered | ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot | |
| Where the work happens | Almost entirely on your website | Roughly four fifths off it, where citations come from |
| What success looks like | A position on page one | Being named in a list of five |
| Primary data source | Google Search Console | Engine output, citation logs, roundups, review platforms, community |
| Channels assumed available | Paid search and social alongside organic | Built for categories where those are closed |
| Monthly deliverable | A traffic report | A score, a per-engine breakdown, and a citation source map |
| When you are not cited | No visibility into why | The exact source that produced a competitor mention instead |
| Refused prompts | Not measured | Reported separately — a refusal is not a loss |
| What compounds | Rankings reset with each core update | Presence in the sources engines read |
Every row above is checkable. If your current agency covers a row we have marked, tell us and we will correct it.
6 sub-industries
The method is the same across the category. The queries that decide it, the sources the engines trust and the rules you work under are not.
Identity and age assurance providers selling into platforms that now have no legal choice.
See the work →Processors, gateways and acquirers serving merchants the mainstream networks decline.
See the work →The networks that sell the reach Google and Meta will not, plus the affiliate ecosystem around them.
See the work →DMCA takedown and leak-monitoring services selling to studios, platforms and creators.
See the work →Hosts and delivery networks that will not drop a client when the content is reviewed.
See the work →2257 record-keeping, age assurance audit and the compliance tooling the new laws created.
See the work →8 questions
No. Your product is B2B software and the marketing is ordinary B2B marketing — comparison pages, review platforms, trade media, schema. Your customers operate in adult; your own site and this engagement do not involve explicit material at any point.
Increasingly, in the same way they use it for any other software decision. The baseline measures which of your category prompts return a named list at all before it measures whether you are on it, and we report both numbers.
That is the best case, not the worst. Where no established shortlist exists the engines assemble one from thin evidence, which means a small amount of correct work moves the answer disproportionately. It also means the position is winnable now and much harder in eighteen months.
Not on this surface. Citation weight follows source presence rather than company age, and incumbents in this category are frequently invisible on review platforms and in comparison content because they never needed them.
Listings and post-event content, yes — both are citation sources and both are routinely left unclaimed. We do not run event logistics or staff stands.
Entity and structured-data corrections can register within two to four weeks. Roundup placement and community presence compound over three to six months. We report monthly either way, so you see progress before it is complete.
No, and you should be sceptical of anyone who does. No AI platform publishes how it selects sources. We work from measured output and correlations documented across the industry, we report honestly, and we re-baseline the source map quarterly because these systems change fast.
No. The monthly plans are cancel any time and the entry engagement is a one-time project with a fixed price. We would rather earn the next month than hold you to a contract. One caveat worth stating plainly: review velocity and third-party coverage compound over three to six months, so leaving at month two means paying for work you never saw finish.
Fifty prompts, four engines, your categories. You will see your score and exactly who is being named instead — before you commit to anything.
Prefer to message? WhatsApp +91 92174 40013